
Overlook the jarring text and spare a moment to sift through these brief scores.
Lord's, 2011: England 127/2; Trent Bridge, 2011: England 221, India
24/1; Edgbaston, 2011: India 224, England 84/0; The Oval, 2011: England
75/0; MCG, 2011: Australia 227/6; SCG, 2012: India 191, Australia 116/3;
the WACA, 2012: India 161, Australia 149/0; Adelaide Oval, 2012:
Australia 335/3; The Wanderers, 2013: India 255/5; Kingsmead, December
2013: India 181/1; Eden Park, 2014: New Zealand 329/4; Basin Reserve,
2014: 192, India 100/2; Trent Bridge, 2014: India 259/4; Lord's, 2014:
India 290/9; The Rose Bowl, 2014: England 247/2; Old Trafford, 2014:
India 152, England 113/3; The Oval, 2014: India 148, England 62/0.
These are the end-of-play scores for the first day of each of India's
overseas Test matches since they ill-fated tour of England in 2011. And
two of those Test matches began with rain-curtailed days, mind you. As
the scores at stumps for most of those opening days suggest, India were
the team playing catch-up. It will not surprise many that India lost 13,
drew three and one won of those 17 Tests.
Across this sequence, the Indian team has too often resembled the seven dwarfs from the fairy tale
Snow White, whistling
their way to work. Plenty of hard yards put in and some genuine good
patches of success to show for it, but still far from being a side that
can consistently compete overseas. And now, at the Adelaide Oval on day
one of the 2014-15 tour of Australia, India are staring at another
uphill task after watching Australia make 354/6, of which 145 came in
163 balls to
David Warner who, until he threw it away, looked set for a double-century and 60 to
Michael Clarke before he had to leave the field with a sore back.
Lose the toss, bowl insufficiently with the two new balls and an old
one, allow the opposition to put up a big total and an opener score a
dominating century - it was an all-too-familiar pattern for India away
from home on day one in Adelaide. At least there were no dropped catches
on Tuesday.
Visiting teams have had worse beginnings to series
- just ask Nasser Hussain - but today's play was another hard one for
India. Apart from
Ishant Sharma,
incidentally the least bowled Indian pacer coming into this Test, the
bowlers were all under-prepared and the lack of potency, if it had not
done so earlier, will have sparked terminal concerns. From the time
Warner took guard, runs were donated by India's new-ball pair of
Mohammed Shami and
Varun Aaron and the debutant legspinner
Karn Sharma, though he improved as the day went on, looked undercooked.
With the Adelaide Oval surface not offering swing or seam to the new
ball, India's three-pronged pace attack needed to hit the right lengths
early on but Ishant aside, could not. Shami and Aaron were given the new
ball and conceded 81 in 13 overs, with Warner able to drive on the rise
without worry of the ball doing much.
Warner's mood was
established early in the morning when he flayed seven of his first 15
deliveries faced to the boundary, three of which came in Aaron's opening
over and three in Shami's second. Shami and Aaron bowled from around
the stumps to the left-handed Warner, but still he was afforded enough
width to cut and drive and there were also ample opportunities to tuck
and flick.
Shami had one good over in his first spell of
5-0-30-0 when he troubled left-hander Chris Rogers, while Aaron went for
23 in his first two overs and 28 in his second spell of six overs,
having a casual shot from Shane Watson to owe for his only success in a
what was a poor day. There was no plan B for Shami and Aaron and this
meant that Virat Kohli, on his first day as Test captain, had to fall
back on Ishant as much as he could.
Ishant - in his eighth Test
on Australian soil - was the stand-out bowler and in truth, without his
control across his first four spells, it would have been worse for
India. He removed the leaden-footed Chris Rogers cheaply and probed away
off a good length, getting a faint bit of movement away on occasion to
keep Mitchell Marsh in check and against the free-stroking Warner,
Ishant gave up 16 runs from 41 deliveries. He carried India all day long
but cannot be expected to do it all on his own.
Karn Sharma,
given an India cap ahead of R Ashwin (21 Tests) and Ravindra Jadeja
(12), was easily lapped by Warner who took 42 runs off 56 balls faced
from the 26-year-old before he deposited a tossed up delivery straight
to deep midwicket during the final session. That moment of
over-confidence did for Warner on 145, looking for a six off Karn Sharma
after swatting consecutive fours off Murali Vijay's innocuous offspin,
but normal service was restored as Steven Smith and Mitchell Marsh put
on 87 in 28 overs. The pair handled Karn Sharma's leg breaks and googles
with ease, Smith in particular dominating with twinkle-toed brilliance
as he drove through the offside and bunted down the ground to leg.
With the new ball, India's fast bowlers, Ishant included, veered onto
the pads too much to allow Smith and Marsh collect runs as the shadows
stretched across the sparkling new Adelaide Oval. Aaron's liveliest
delivery of the day got rid of Marsh and the wickets of the
nightwatchman Nathan Lyon and Brad Haddin to Shami shortly before stumps
gave India some lift at the end of a very tough day, but the fear is
that they have lost too much ground already.
In the field too
they were too lethargic, with too many fielders diving over the ball.
There were also a couple run-out chances missed, adding to the
impression of a team perennially in transition since 2012 and without
much to fall back on. And that, in a nutshell, has been their failing
throughout a miserable run of form away from home in the last
three-and-a-half years.
Comparisons with the 2011-12 tour of
Australia will become tiresome - or are they already? - but to avert
another 0-4 rout, something drastic is required from India in all
departments. Winning in Australia is challenging enough without
conceding dangerous head-starts, and by letting the hosts get to a
dominant position the tourists - Smith is 72 not out - have not done
themselves too many favours.